RAJO DEVI vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 105/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010015882026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1542/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
105/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
601
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJO DEVI
Adv. unknown
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge Supaul granted bail to Rajo Devi, accused of taking a newborn baby from hospital custody under BNS sections 137(2), 140(3), and 3(5). The court found that while the accused's intention was not to harm the child and she attempted to nurture it maternally, taking a minor from biological mother's custody remains a serious offense punishable for less than 7 years. Bail was allowed at Rs. 20,000 with two sureties after considering the accused's extended custody since December 13, 2025, completed investigation, and filed chargesheet, with the condition that bail bond acceptance occurs post-charge framing to prevent trial obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Judge Supaul granted bail to Rajo Devi, accused of taking a newborn baby from hospital custody under BNS sections 137(2), 140(3), and 3(5). The court found that while the accused's intention was not to harm the child and she attempted to nurture it maternally, taking a minor from biological mother's custody remains a serious offense punishable for less than 7 years. Bail was allowed at Rs. 20,000 with two sureties after considering the accused's extended custody since December 13, 2025, completed investigation, and filed chargesheet, with the condition that bail bond acceptance occurs post-charge framing to prevent trial obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts