RAJO DEVI vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 105/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSU010015882026

Filing Number

1542/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

601

Police Station

SUPAUL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJO DEVI

    Adv. unknown

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge Supaul granted bail to Rajo Devi, accused of taking a newborn baby from hospital custody under BNS sections 137(2), 140(3), and 3(5). The court found that while the accused's intention was not to harm the child and she attempted to nurture it maternally, taking a minor from biological mother's custody remains a serious offense punishable for less than 7 years. Bail was allowed at Rs. 20,000 with two sureties after considering the accused's extended custody since December 13, 2025, completed investigation, and filed chargesheet, with the condition that bail bond acceptance occurs post-charge framing to prevent trial obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge Supaul granted bail to Rajo Devi, accused of taking a newborn baby from hospital custody under BNS sections 137(2), 140(3), and 3(5). The court found that while the accused's intention was not to harm the child and she attempted to nurture it maternally, taking a minor from biological mother's custody remains a serious offense punishable for less than 7 years. Bail was allowed at Rs. 20,000 with two sureties after considering the accused's extended custody since December 13, 2025, completed investigation, and filed chargesheet, with the condition that bail bond acceptance occurs post-charge framing to prevent trial obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case