SULEMAN SAFI AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 101/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010014942026
Filing Number
1449/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
101/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
PIPRA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SULEMAN SAFI AND OTHERS
Adv. SADANAND DAS
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Suleman Safi and Others v. State of Bihar (B.A.-101/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Suleman Safi and Anita Devi, who are accused of assisting in human trafficking under BNS sections 137(2) and 140(3). The court found that the petitioners, parents of main accused Subhan Safi (declared juvenile), harbored a minor girl (aged 17 years 16 days) in their Delhi house after she was taken there by their son, and concealed her until recovery by Delhi Police. The court deemed the allegations serious, investigation preliminary-stage, and noted risk of evidence tampering, but allowed them to file fresh bail after chargesheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Suleman Safi and Others v. State of Bihar (B.A.-101/2026) The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Suleman Safi and Anita Devi, who are accused of assisting in human trafficking under BNS sections 137(2) and 140(3). The court found that the petitioners, parents of main accused Subhan Safi (declared juvenile), harbored a minor girl (aged 17 years 16 days) in their Delhi house after she was taken there by their son, and concealed her until recovery by Delhi Police. The court deemed the allegations serious, investigation preliminary-stage, and noted risk of evidence tampering, but allowed them to file fresh bail after chargesheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts