KRISHN KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 204/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,352(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010012612026
Filing Number
1220/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
204/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
TRIBENIGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHN KUMAR
Adv. NAGENDRA NARAYAN THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case 204/2026 Summary: Petitioner Krishan Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 07/2026. The court permitted withdrawal of the application after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner had been granted privilege under Section 35(3) of BNSS, with the State not opposing the withdrawal. The anticipatory bail application was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 204/2026
Case 204/2026 Summary: Petitioner Krishan Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 07/2026. The court permitted withdrawal of the application after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner had been granted privilege under Section 35(3) of BNSS, with the State not opposing the withdrawal. The anticipatory bail application was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts