SAKINA KHATOON AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 184/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),76,303(1),329(3),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010011492026
Filing Number
1110/2026
Filing Date
31-01-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
368
Police Station
CHHATAPUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAKINA KHATOON AND OTHERS
Adv. UNKNOWN
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sakina Khatoon v. State of Bihar (184/2026) The court rejected the interim bail application of the accused Sakina Khatoon and Mo. Tahir. The accused were charged under serious BNS sections (126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 303, 329(3), 351, 351(2), 3(5)) for allegedly attacking the complainant (a woman) at night with weapons including swords and daggers, causing injuries, attempted sexual assault, robbery of ₹70,000 and jewelry, and intimidation. The court found the charges grave based on the victim's consistent testimony, injury records, and case diary evidence, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sakina Khatoon v. State of Bihar (184/2026) The court rejected the interim bail application of the accused Sakina Khatoon and Mo. Tahir. The accused were charged under serious BNS sections (126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 303, 329(3), 351, 351(2), 3(5)) for allegedly attacking the complainant (a woman) at night with weapons including swords and daggers, causing injuries, attempted sexual assault, robbery of ₹70,000 and jewelry, and intimidation. The court found the charges grave based on the victim's consistent testimony, injury records, and case diary evidence, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts