RAMU MUKHIYA AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 182/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,76,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010011112026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1072/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

182/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

224

Police Station

Bhaptiyahi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,76,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

RAMU MUKHIYA AND OTHERS

Adv. PRAVEEN KUMAR MEHTA

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge

07-05-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

HEARING

22-04-2026

HEARING

17-04-2026

HEARING

08-04-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Copy of order

Case Summary: 182/2026 The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all six accused persons (Ramu Mukhiya and others) charged with assaulting two minor girls on 24.10.2025. The court found that while witnesses supported the prosecution's case, the medical reports showed only simple injuries on both victims, the accused had clean antecedents, and it was unclear which accused caused the injuries. Consequently, all petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs.20,000 bond each with two sureties, conditional upon compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 182/2026 The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all six accused persons (Ramu Mukhiya and others) charged with assaulting two minor girls on 24.10.2025. The court found that while witnesses supported the prosecution's case, the medical reports showed only simple injuries on both victims, the accused had clean antecedents, and it was unclear which accused caused the injuries. Consequently, all petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs.20,000 bond each with two sureties, conditional upon compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case