PAVAN MEHTA AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 181/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010011102026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1071/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

181/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323
Dowry Prohibition (D.P) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

PAVAN MEHTA AND OTHERS

Adv. KRIPA NAND PODDAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge

16-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

HEARING

28-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Copy of order

Case 181/2026 Summary The Sessions Judge, Supaul allowed the anticipatory bail application of Pawan Mehta, Prakash Mehta, and Jago Devi, accused of dowry harassment and cruelty under IPC Sections 498(A) and 323. The court found the allegations general in nature, requiring no custodial interrogation, and noted the complainant filed duplicate cases (complaint + FIR) for the same offence, which is unjustifiable. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties, subject to section 482 B.N.S.S conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 181/2026 Summary The Sessions Judge, Supaul allowed the anticipatory bail application of Pawan Mehta, Prakash Mehta, and Jago Devi, accused of dowry harassment and cruelty under IPC Sections 498(A) and 323. The court found the allegations general in nature, requiring no custodial interrogation, and noted the complainant filed duplicate cases (complaint + FIR) for the same offence, which is unjustifiable. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties, subject to section 482 B.N.S.S conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case