PRAVESH CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 159/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),74,352(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010008842026

Filing Number

853/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

435

Police Station

SUPAUL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),74,352(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVESH CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS

    Adv. BASUDEO MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application of all five accused petitioners charged with assault and related offenses under BNS sections. The court found that despite witness statements supporting the prosecution, the medical injury reports showed only simple injuries inconsistent with the alleged Farsa (axe) attacks, no evidence corroborated the jewelry snatching allegation, and the accused had no prior criminal history. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 20,000 bonds each with two sureties, requiring surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application of all five accused petitioners charged with assault and related offenses under BNS sections. The court found that despite witness statements supporting the prosecution, the medical injury reports showed only simple injuries inconsistent with the alleged Farsa (axe) attacks, no evidence corroborated the jewelry snatching allegation, and the accused had no prior criminal history. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 20,000 bonds each with two sureties, requiring surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case