PRAVESH CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 159/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),74,352(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010008842026

Case disposed

Filing Number

853/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

435

Police Station

SUPAUL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),74,352(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

PRAVESH CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS

Adv. BASUDEO MEHTA

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

HEARING

20-02-2026

HEARING

06-02-2026

HEARING

29-01-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of order

The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application of all five accused petitioners charged with assault and related offenses under BNS sections. The court found that despite witness statements supporting the prosecution, the medical injury reports showed only simple injuries inconsistent with the alleged Farsa (axe) attacks, no evidence corroborated the jewelry snatching allegation, and the accused had no prior criminal history. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 20,000 bonds each with two sureties, requiring surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application of all five accused petitioners charged with assault and related offenses under BNS sections. The court found that despite witness statements supporting the prosecution, the medical injury reports showed only simple injuries inconsistent with the alleged Farsa (axe) attacks, no evidence corroborated the jewelry snatching allegation, and the accused had no prior criminal history. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 20,000 bonds each with two sureties, requiring surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case