RAMPRAVESH MANDAL AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 158/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,126(2),115(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 14th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010008832026
Filing Number
852/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
158/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMPRAVESH MANDAL AND OTHERS
Adv. SURESH KUMAR AZAD
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 29-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 158/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Rampravesh Mandal and others. The petitioners were accused of offenses under BNS sections 85, 126(2), 115(2), and 140(2) involving allegations that they coerced the female complainant into a physical relationship through marriage promises, caused her pregnancy, demanded dowry, and threatened forced remarriage. Finding direct and serious charges of dowry-related harassment, mental torture, and coercion to abort the pregnancy, the court held that bail was not warranted and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 158/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Rampravesh Mandal and others. The petitioners were accused of offenses under BNS sections 85, 126(2), 115(2), and 140(2) involving allegations that they coerced the female complainant into a physical relationship through marriage promises, caused her pregnancy, demanded dowry, and threatened forced remarriage. Finding direct and serious charges of dowry-related harassment, mental torture, and coercion to abort the pregnancy, the court held that bail was not warranted and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts