MD. HASBUL vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 124/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,303(2),76,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010006582026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
636/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
124/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
298
Police Station
BIRPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD. HASBUL
Adv. BHANU KUMAR PATHAK
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Supaul, granted interim bail to the accused Mo. Hasbul in a criminal case (Virapur PS Case No. 298/25) involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115, 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that the underlying dispute was primarily a land-related civil matter between relatives, noting that prior bail had already been granted to co-accused Mo. Ikbal, and that the allegations appeared connected to domestic conflict rather than constituting serious criminal conduct. The accused was ordered released on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to compliance with CrPC Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Supaul, granted interim bail to the accused Mo. Hasbul in a criminal case (Virapur PS Case No. 298/25) involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115, 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that the underlying dispute was primarily a land-related civil matter between relatives, noting that prior bail had already been granted to co-accused Mo. Ikbal, and that the allegations appeared connected to domestic conflict rather than constituting serious criminal conduct. The accused was ordered released on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to compliance with CrPC Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts