MD. HASBUL vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 124/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,303(2),76,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010006582026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

636/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

124/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

298

Police Station

BIRPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,303(2),76,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

MD. HASBUL

Adv. BHANU KUMAR PATHAK

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

01-04-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

17-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of order

Summary The District and Sessions Court, Supaul, granted interim bail to the accused Mo. Hasbul in a criminal case (Virapur PS Case No. 298/25) involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115, 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that the underlying dispute was primarily a land-related civil matter between relatives, noting that prior bail had already been granted to co-accused Mo. Ikbal, and that the allegations appeared connected to domestic conflict rather than constituting serious criminal conduct. The accused was ordered released on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to compliance with CrPC Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District and Sessions Court, Supaul, granted interim bail to the accused Mo. Hasbul in a criminal case (Virapur PS Case No. 298/25) involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115, 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that the underlying dispute was primarily a land-related civil matter between relatives, noting that prior bail had already been granted to co-accused Mo. Ikbal, and that the allegations appeared connected to domestic conflict rather than constituting serious criminal conduct. The accused was ordered released on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to compliance with CrPC Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case