GOPAL CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 117/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010006292026
Filing Number
607/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
245
Police Station
CHHATAPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOPAL CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS
Adv. NAGENDRA NARAYAN THAKUR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 08-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: A.B.A. 117/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all three accused (Gopal Choudhary, Bambam Choudhary, and Ranjan Devi) charged with kidnapping and extortion. The court found the case to be false after the recovered victim girl stated she was a major who had voluntarily married Mantu Kumar on 25.04.2025 and was living happily with him, making no allegations against the accused. The judge concluded the informant filed a false case due to personal enmity and directed release on bail bonds of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: A.B.A. 117/2026 The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all three accused (Gopal Choudhary, Bambam Choudhary, and Ranjan Devi) charged with kidnapping and extortion. The court found the case to be false after the recovered victim girl stated she was a major who had voluntarily married Mantu Kumar on 25.04.2025 and was living happily with him, making no allegations against the accused. The judge concluded the informant filed a false case due to personal enmity and directed release on bail bonds of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts