JAYKRISHNA YADAV AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 85/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(3),190,126(2),115(2),118,117(2),109,303(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010004912026
Filing Number
473/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
85/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
LOKHA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYKRISHNA YADAV AND OTHERS
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR VERMA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 85/2026 The Sessions Judge, Supaul, disposed of an anticipatory bail application by four accused persons charged with assault and theft arising from a November 2025 incident. The court rejected anticipatory bail for Jai Krishna Yadav (primary accused), finding specific allegations and corroborating medical evidence of injuries to vital body parts, deeming custodial interrogation necessary. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the three co-accused (Suryanarayan, Devnarayan, and Madho Yadav) for Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties, finding no specific allegations of active participation or injury causation against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 85/2026 The Sessions Judge, Supaul, disposed of an anticipatory bail application by four accused persons charged with assault and theft arising from a November 2025 incident. The court rejected anticipatory bail for Jai Krishna Yadav (primary accused), finding specific allegations and corroborating medical evidence of injuries to vital body parts, deeming custodial interrogation necessary. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the three co-accused (Suryanarayan, Devnarayan, and Madho Yadav) for Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties, finding no specific allegations of active participation or injury causation against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts