ANIKET KUMAR RANJAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 79/2026

Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 7. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010004182026

Case disposed

Filing Number

402/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

15-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

429

Police Station

BIRPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act Section 7

Petitioner(s)

ANIKET KUMAR RANJAN AND OTHERS

Adv. SHASHIBHUSHAN LAL DAS

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge

24-04-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

HEARING

17-04-2026

HEARING

08-04-2026

HEARING

25-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Copy of order

The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to Aniket Kumar Ranjan and Durganand Kumar Sah in connection with charges under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for illicit storage of 59 bags of urea fertilizer. The court found that offences under Section 7 of the E.C. Act are bailable since the 1981 Amendment making them non-bailable had expired and no subsequent legislation continued that provision. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to Aniket Kumar Ranjan and Durganand Kumar Sah in connection with charges under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for illicit storage of 59 bags of urea fertilizer. The court found that offences under Section 7 of the E.C. Act are bailable since the 1981 Amendment making them non-bailable had expired and no subsequent legislation continued that provision. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case