MD. TOHID vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 77/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,126(2),115(2),303(2),352,351(2)(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010004142026
Filing Number
398/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
77/2026
Registration Date
15-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
DAGMARA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. TOHID
Adv. RAMJEE PRASAD SAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary of Case 77/2026: The court rejected MD. Tohid's anticipatory bail application in connection with FIR No. 60/2025 (Dogmara Police Station) involving charges under IPC sections 85, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2)(3), 3(5), and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the charges serious with sentences exceeding 7 years and directed the applicant to appear before the investigating officer and comply with Section 35(g) BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Session Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Session Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2026
Summary of Case 77/2026: The court rejected MD. Tohid's anticipatory bail application in connection with FIR No. 60/2025 (Dogmara Police Station) involving charges under IPC sections 85, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2)(3), 3(5), and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the charges serious with sentences exceeding 7 years and directed the applicant to appear before the investigating officer and comply with Section 35(g) BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts