SANJEEV KUMAR YADAV vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 32/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),308(2),308(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSU010003782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

363/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

613

Police Station

SUPAUL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),308(2),308(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

SANJEEV KUMAR YADAV

Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: 6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

26-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

HEARING

17-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of order

SUMMARY: The court approved bail applications for two accused, Sanjay Kumar Yadav and Raja Singh, in a case involving serious charges under BNS Sections 308(2), 308(5) and related provisions (extortion, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint). The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for over three months, the investigation was substantially complete with charge-sheet filed, and there was no significant flight risk. The accused were released on bail with surety bonds of Rs. 10,000 each and conditions including cooperation with the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court approved bail applications for two accused, Sanjay Kumar Yadav and Raja Singh, in a case involving serious charges under BNS Sections 308(2), 308(5) and related provisions (extortion, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint). The court found that the accused had been in judicial custody for over three months, the investigation was substantially complete with charge-sheet filed, and there was no significant flight risk. The accused were released on bail with surety bonds of Rs. 10,000 each and conditions including cooperation with the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Supaul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case