RAMRATAN ROY AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 67/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),118(1),109,132,121,122,262,263,352,351(2)(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010003722026
Filing Number
357/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
67/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
99
Police Station
RATANPURA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMRATAN ROY AND OTHERS
Adv. PURSOTTAM KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 67/2026 Decision: The court ALLOWED the anticipatory bail application for all five female petitioners (Koshila Devi, Kiran Kumari, Kalamwati Devi, Pujan Devi, and Beena Devi). Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioners were implicated based solely on being family members of the main accused Ramratan Rai, with only general allegations of obstructing police duty. The petitioners have clean antecedents, the investigating officer failed to collect injury reports despite claimed police assault, and no direct evidence linked them to the alleged offense. Conditions: Each petitioner must furnish bail bonds of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and must comply with section 482 of B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 67/2026 Decision: The court ALLOWED the anticipatory bail application for all five female petitioners (Koshila Devi, Kiran Kumari, Kalamwati Devi, Pujan Devi, and Beena Devi). Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioners were implicated based solely on being family members of the main accused Ramratan Rai, with only general allegations of obstructing police duty. The petitioners have clean antecedents, the investigating officer failed to collect injury reports despite claimed police assault, and no direct evidence linked them to the alleged offense. Conditions: Each petitioner must furnish bail bonds of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and must comply with section 482 of B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts