SUBODH SHARMA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 46/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(2),305(A). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010002732026
Filing Number
262/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
438
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBODH SHARMA
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: 46/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul rejected Subodh Sharma's anticipatory bail petition in a theft case. The court found substantial incriminating evidence: the stolen mobile phone was recovered from the petitioner's possession with a different SIM card, he previously fled police custody (triggering a separate case), and witness statements corroborated the theft. Given the petitioner's prior criminal history and ongoing investigation, the court determined a risk of evidence tampering if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2026
Case Summary: 46/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul rejected Subodh Sharma's anticipatory bail petition in a theft case. The court found substantial incriminating evidence: the stolen mobile phone was recovered from the petitioner's possession with a different SIM card, he previously fled police custody (triggering a separate case), and witness statements corroborated the theft. Given the petitioner's prior criminal history and ongoing investigation, the court determined a risk of evidence tampering if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts