SUBODH SHARMA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 46/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(2),305(A). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010002732026
Filing Number
262/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
438
Police Station
SUPAUL
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUBODH SHARMA
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 46/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul rejected Subodh Sharma's anticipatory bail petition in a theft case. The court found substantial incriminating evidence: the stolen mobile phone was recovered from the petitioner's possession with a different SIM card, he previously fled police custody (triggering a separate case), and witness statements corroborated the theft. Given the petitioner's prior criminal history and ongoing investigation, the court determined a risk of evidence tampering if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 46/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul rejected Subodh Sharma's anticipatory bail petition in a theft case. The court found substantial incriminating evidence: the stolen mobile phone was recovered from the petitioner's possession with a different SIM card, he previously fled police custody (triggering a separate case), and witness statements corroborated the theft. Given the petitioner's prior criminal history and ongoing investigation, the court determined a risk of evidence tampering if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts