SANTOSH PASWAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 42/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010002682026
Filing Number
257/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
381
Police Station
BIRPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSH PASWAN AND OTHERS
Adv. NAGENDRA NARAYAN THAKUR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ABA-42/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail applications of Santosh Paswan, Mantu Paswan, and Makeshwar Paswan in a murder case. The court found serious allegations that the accused actively participated in killing Ramprasad Deo using sharp-edged weapons, with evidence including witness statements, call records, CCTV footage, and a postmortem report confirming fatal throat injuries. The court deemed custodial interrogation necessary and ruled the allegations too grave to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA-42/2026 The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail applications of Santosh Paswan, Mantu Paswan, and Makeshwar Paswan in a murder case. The court found serious allegations that the accused actively participated in killing Ramprasad Deo using sharp-edged weapons, with evidence including witness statements, call records, CCTV footage, and a postmortem report confirming fatal throat injuries. The court deemed custodial interrogation necessary and ruled the allegations too grave to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts