MANIBHUSHAN KUMAR SUDHAKAR vs TWO UNKNOWN — 19/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,328,379,411,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSU010002352021
Filing Number
201/2021
Filing Date
18-Jan-2021
Registration No
19/2021
Registration Date
18-Jan-2021
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
183
Police Station
CHHATAPUR
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANIBHUSHAN KUMAR SUDHAKAR
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.TWO UNKNOWN
-
2.RAJESH KUMAR MANDAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court of Supaul acquitted accused Rajesh Kumar Mandal of charges under IPC sections 420, 328, 379, and 411/34 (cheating, poisoning, theft, and criminal conspiracy) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish direct or circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the alleged robbery incident despite examining five witnesses, as none of them could credibly identify the accused or provide substantive testimony corroborating the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Session Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Argument
Principal District and Session Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
24-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
26-May-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
18-May-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
15-Jan-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
05-Oct-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
08-Sep-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
17-Jun-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
15-Apr-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
23-Nov-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
20-Sep-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
10-Aug-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
17-Jun-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
10-May-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
25-Mar-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
07-Feb-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
14-Dec-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
23-Oct-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
31-Aug-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
22-Jul-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
14-Jun-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
06-May-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
25-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Session Judge
-
15-Feb-2021
Charge
Principal District and Session Judge
-
30-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2021
Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court of Supaul acquitted accused Rajesh Kumar Mandal of charges under IPC sections 420, 328, 379, and 411/34 (cheating, poisoning, theft, and criminal conspiracy) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish direct or circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the alleged robbery incident despite examining five witnesses, as none of them could credibly identify the accused or provide substantive testimony corroborating the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts