SHANKAR KUMAR GUPTA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 31/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,341,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010002262026

Filing Number

218/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,341,34
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. JANARDAN PRASAD SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all four accused (Santosh Kumar Gupta, Kalicharan Gupta, Veena Devi, and Shankar Kumar Gupta) in a dowry harassment case. The court found the main grievance was property registration in the mother-in-law's name with no specific allegations against others, offences were bailable, no custodial interrogation was needed, and the complainant was a Bihar Police Constable. Each accused must furnish ₹20,000 bail with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted anticipatory bail to all four accused (Santosh Kumar Gupta, Kalicharan Gupta, Veena Devi, and Shankar Kumar Gupta) in a dowry harassment case. The court found the main grievance was property registration in the mother-in-law's name with no specific allegations against others, offences were bailable, no custodial interrogation was needed, and the complainant was a Bihar Police Constable. Each accused must furnish ₹20,000 bail with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case