DULAR RAY vs MUSMAT RAMRATI DEVI AND OTHERS — 174/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Service Report. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Service Report Next hearing 22-May-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit/ Partition Suit

CNR: BRST120002142022

Filing Number

212/2022

Filing Date

04-Jul-2022

Registration No

174/2022

Registration Date

04-Jul-2022

Court

Pupri Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DULAR RAY

    Adv. CHHABINANDAN THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUSMAT RAMRATI DEVI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  6. 07-Aug-2025

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  7. 11-Jun-2025

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  8. 22-May-2025

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  9. 20-Mar-2025

    Service Report

    Incharge Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  10. 20-Jan-2025

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  11. 28-Nov-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  12. 17-Oct-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  13. 30-Aug-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  14. 20-Jul-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  15. 21-Jun-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  16. 11-Jun-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction to restrain defendants from alienating suit land pending partition proceedings is rejected outright. The court found that the plaintiff concealed the material fact of having already sold ancestral property before filing the petition, violating the principle of equity that requires parties to approach courts with clean hands. The plaintiff is ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to be deposited in the Nazarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 11-Jun-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  18. 01-Jun-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  19. 27-May-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  20. 13-May-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  21. 01-May-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  22. 15-Apr-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  23. 20-Mar-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  24. 01-Feb-2024

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  25. 23-Dec-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  26. 25-Nov-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  27. 01-Nov-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  28. 20-Sep-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  29. 04-Aug-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  30. 05-Jul-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  31. 06-Jun-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  32. 26-Apr-2023

    Service Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  33. 28-Feb-2023

    Sristedar Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  34. 16-Dec-2022

    Sristedar Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  35. 01-Nov-2022

    Sristedar Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  36. 26-Aug-2022

    Sristedar Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  37. 12-Aug-2022

    Sristedar Report

    Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

  38. 25-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 04-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 174/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction to restrain defendants from alienating suit land pending partition proceedings is rejected outright. The court found that the plaintiff concealed the material fact of having already sold ancestral property before filing the petition, violating the principle of equity that requires parties to approach courts with clean hands. The plaintiff is ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to be deposited in the Nazarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case