AKHILESHWAR KUMAR vs CHANDRABHUSHAN MISHRA AND ORS — 123/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 04th May 2026.

Partition Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT

CNR: BRST120001592017

Case disposed

Filing Number

123/2017

Filing Date

01-11-2017

Registration No

123/2017

Registration Date

01-11-2017

Court

Pupri Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

AKHILESHWAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

CHANDRABHUSHAN MISHRA AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub-Judge I-cum-A.C.J.M.

04-05-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE

02-02-2026

EVIDENCE

03-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: 123/2017 - Akhileshwar Kumar v. Chandrabhushan Mishra The court disposed of this title suit through compromise settlement dated 14.03.2024, wherein all parties agreed to partition jointly-held family property. The court directed the Officer-in-Charge to prepare a preliminary decree allocating Schedule-1 land to the plaintiff, Schedule-2 to defendant no.02, and Schedule-3 to defendant no.01, in accordance with the agreed compromise petition filed under Section 23 R.3 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 123/2017 - Akhileshwar Kumar v. Chandrabhushan Mishra The court disposed of this title suit through compromise settlement dated 14.03.2024, wherein all parties agreed to partition jointly-held family property. The court directed the Officer-in-Charge to prepare a preliminary decree allocating Schedule-1 land to the plaintiff, Schedule-2 to defendant no.02, and Schedule-3 to defendant no.01, in accordance with the agreed compromise petition filed under Section 23 R.3 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Pupri Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case