ABDUL RAJJAK vs RAMDEV MAHTO @ SUMAN MAHTO AND OTHERS — 2781/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 417, 418, 420, 465, 467, 468, 469, 470, 477, 120B, 171(CHA). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRST110031532014
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
2781/2014
Filing Date
02-12-2013
Registration No
2781/2014
Registration Date
02-12-2013
Court
Pupri CJM Division
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate 1st class Cum Addl. Civil Judge(Jr. Div)
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
SURSAND
Year
2001
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABDUL RAJJAK
Adv. N/A
Respondent(s)
RAMDEV MAHTO @ SUMAN MAHTO AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate 1st class Cum Addl. Civil Judge(Jr. Div)
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 08-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-07-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-04-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by Aalim Samarpith Abhiyukt challenging a land acquisition notice was allowed. The court found that the acquisition notice violated IPC sections 167, 417, 418, 420, 467, 465, 468, 469, 471, and 477, and directed the petitioner to file a criminal complaint against the responsible officers within the prescribed time. The acquisition proceedings were quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by Aalim Samarpith Abhiyukt challenging a land acquisition notice was allowed. The court found that the acquisition notice violated IPC sections 167, 417, 418, 420, 467, 465, 468, 469, 471, and 477, and directed the petitioner to file a criminal complaint against the responsible officers within the prescribed time. The acquisition proceedings were quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts