RAMNANDAN SHARMA vs RAMSANAHI RAY AND OTHER Advocate - NA — 2342/2014

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 467,468,406,408,409,420,120B,109. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRST110018372014

Filing Number

2342/2014

Filing Date

24-Dec-2014

Registration No

2342/2014

Registration Date

24-Dec-2014

Court

Pupri CJM Division

Judge

1-S.d.j.m., Poopri

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

SURSAND

Year

2000

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 467,468,406,408,409,420,120B,109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMNANDAN SHARMA

    Adv. NA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMSANAHI RAY AND OTHER Advocate - NA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    The court held that the petitioner Ramnandan Sharma failed to present adequate evidence to support his allegations against respondent Ramsanahi Ray and others. The court found that charges under Sections 467, 468, 409, 420, 120B IPC and relevant provisions could not be substantiated as the petitioner did not produce credible witnesses or documentation. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for lack of sufficient grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  11. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  12. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  13. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  14. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  15. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  16. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  18. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  19. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  20. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  21. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    IC S.D.J.M. Poopri

  22. 21-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  23. 08-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  24. 20-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  25. 11-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  26. 20-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  27. 09-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  28. 22-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  29. 03-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  30. 17-May-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  31. 15-May-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  32. 31-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  33. 23-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  34. 18-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  35. 09-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  36. 04-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  37. 23-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  38. 08-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  39. 09-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  40. 13-May-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  41. 12-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  42. 09-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  43. 02-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  44. 27-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  45. 27-May-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  46. 15-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  47. 19-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  48. 17-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 24-Dec-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2342/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The court held that the petitioner Ramnandan Sharma failed to present adequate evidence to support his allegations against respondent Ramsanahi Ray and others. The court found that charges under Sections 467, 468, 409, 420, 120B IPC and relevant provisions could not be substantiated as the petitioner did not produce credible witnesses or documentation. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for lack of sufficient grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case