RAMBALI MAHTO vs MISHRILAL MAHTO AND OTHERS — 266/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,341,342,323,379,448,354(B),456,504,307,506/34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRST110010442025

Filing Number

1041/2025

Filing Date

09-Jan-2025

Registration No

266/2025

Registration Date

09-Jan-2025

Court

Pupri CJM Division

Judge

1-S.d.j.m., Poopri

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

551

Police Station

PUPRI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,341,342,323,379,448,354(B),456,504,307,506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMBALI MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MISHRILAL MAHTO AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order

    In Case 266/2025 before the S.D.J.M. Pupri (Sitamarhi), the court found that Rambali Mahto's application was admissible and established that family/kinship relationships exist, though no property/assets were recovered from the opposing party (Mishrilal Mahto and others). The court directed that the matter be registered under Section 203 of the CrPC and instructed the law enforcement to proceed accordingly with the case investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    Awated for final form / Chargesheet

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  9. 17-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 266/2025 before the S.D.J.M. Pupri (Sitamarhi), the court found that Rambali Mahto's application was admissible and established that family/kinship relationships exist, though no property/assets were recovered from the opposing party (Mishrilal Mahto and others). The court directed that the matter be registered under Section 203 of the CrPC and instructed the law enforcement to proceed accordingly with the case investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case