VIBHA DEVI vs ANIL CHAUDHAR I OTS — 321/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,324,341,506. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRST110003422016

Filing Number

321/2016

Filing Date

13-May-2016

Registration No

321/2016

Registration Date

13-May-2016

Court

Pupri CJM Division

Judge

1-S.d.j.m., Poopri

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

PUPRI

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,324,341,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIBHA DEVI

    Adv. NA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANIL CHAUDHAR I OTS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed Vibha Devi's petition against Anil Chaudhary regarding disputed property rights in Sitamahdi district. The court found that the accusations against the respondent lacked proper evidence and that the petitioner failed to establish her case under relevant civil laws (IPC sections 147, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506). No relief was granted to the petitioner due to insufficient substantiation of claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  8. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  9. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  10. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  11. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  12. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  13. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  14. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  15. 02-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  16. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    IC S.D.J.M. Poopri

  17. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  18. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  19. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  20. 24-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  21. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  22. 20-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  23. 18-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  24. 29-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  25. 16-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  26. 21-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  27. 21-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  28. 18-May-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  29. 09-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  30. 09-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  31. 02-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  32. 09-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  33. 07-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  34. 21-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  35. 23-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  36. 28-May-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  37. 24-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  38. 22-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  39. 18-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  40. 16-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  41. 10-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  42. 30-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  43. 19-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  44. 20-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 13-May-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 321/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Vibha Devi's petition against Anil Chaudhary regarding disputed property rights in Sitamahdi district. The court found that the accusations against the respondent lacked proper evidence and that the petitioner failed to establish her case under relevant civil laws (IPC sections 147, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506). No relief was granted to the petitioner due to insufficient substantiation of claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case