NEETU DEVI vs VIJAY CHOUDHARY AND 2 OTHERS — 212/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,379,504,498A. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRST110000712014
Filing Number
212/2014
Filing Date
10-06-2003
Registration No
212/2014
Registration Date
24-12-2014
Court
Pupri CJM Division
Judge
1-S.D.J.M., Poopri
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
372
Police Station
NANHPUR
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NEETU DEVI
Adv. N/A
Respondent(s)
VIJAY CHOUDHARY AND 2 OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-S.D.J.M., Poopri
Disposed
ARGUMENTS
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the accused's petition under Section 498A IPC (dowry harassment) and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act after finding that the complainant failed to produce sufficient evidence before the court and that the allegations lacked corroboration. The court held that the accused could not be prosecuted without credible evidence, noting that the petition was filed beyond the prescribed timeframe and the witnesses' statements in the charge sheet did not substantiate the complaints against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the accused's petition under Section 498A IPC (dowry harassment) and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act after finding that the complainant failed to produce sufficient evidence before the court and that the allegations lacked corroboration. The court held that the accused could not be prosecuted without credible evidence, noting that the petition was filed beyond the prescribed timeframe and the witnesses' statements in the charge sheet did not substantiate the complaints against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts