NEETU DEVI vs VIJAY CHOUDHARY AND 2 OTHERS — 212/2014

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,379,504,498A. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRST110000712014

Filing Number

212/2014

Filing Date

10-Jun-2003

Registration No

212/2014

Registration Date

24-Dec-2014

Court

Pupri CJM Division

Judge

1-S.d.j.m., Poopri

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

372

Police Station

NANHPUR

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,379,504,498A
Prevention of Dowry Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEETU DEVI

    Adv. N/A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY CHOUDHARY AND 2 OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed the accused's petition under Section 498A IPC (dowry harassment) and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act after finding that the complainant failed to produce sufficient evidence before the court and that the allegations lacked corroboration. The court held that the accused could not be prosecuted without credible evidence, noting that the petition was filed beyond the prescribed timeframe and the witnesses' statements in the charge sheet did not substantiate the complaints against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  10. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  11. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  12. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  13. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  14. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  15. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  16. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  17. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  18. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    IC S.D.J.M. Poopri

  19. 27-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    IC S.D.J.M. Poopri

  20. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  21. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  22. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  23. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  24. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  25. 04-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  26. 13-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  27. 20-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  28. 18-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  29. 29-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  30. 29-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  31. 23-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  32. 08-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  33. 09-Aug-2021

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  34. 03-May-2021

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  35. 08-Jan-2021

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  36. 28-Aug-2020

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  37. 02-Jun-2020

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  38. 25-Feb-2020

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  39. 28-Nov-2019

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  40. 13-Sep-2019

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  41. 09-Jul-2019

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  42. 26-Apr-2019

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  43. 21-Jan-2019

    Appearence

    S.d.j.m., Poopri

  44. 23-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 10-Jun-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. 212/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the accused's petition under Section 498A IPC (dowry harassment) and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act after finding that the complainant failed to produce sufficient evidence before the court and that the allegations lacked corroboration. The court held that the accused could not be prosecuted without credible evidence, noting that the petition was filed beyond the prescribed timeframe and the witnesses' statements in the charge sheet did not substantiate the complaints against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case