MD KASIM ANSHARI vs MONSIR ANSHARI — 2704/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,302. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

criminal. case - criminal.case

CNR: BRST010100772021

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

8462/2021

Filing Date

15-12-2021

Registration No

2704/2021

Registration Date

15-12-2021

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

BELA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,302

Petitioner(s)

MD KASIM ANSHARI

Adv. N/A

Respondent(s)

MONSIR ANSHARI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

14-05-2026

EVIDENCE

10-04-2026

EVIDENCE

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE

28-01-2026

EVIDENCE

08-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

19-01-2022
Copy of order

Case Summary: 2704/2021 (MD KASIM ANSHARI v. MONSIR ANSHARI) Outcome: The bail petition filed by MD KASIM ANSHARI was rejected/denied. The petitioner, a child in conflict with law, was accused in connection with the death of his grandson (Md. Jisan Ansari, age 6) who went missing on 11.04.2021 and was found dead with burn injuries. Despite claims of innocence and false implication due to village politics, the court found credible evidence including confessional statements, adverse social background reports showing lack of discipline and quarrelsome nature, and hostile community perception. The court determined that releasing the petitioner on bail posed moral, physical, and psychological danger to him and would defeat justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2704/2021 (MD KASIM ANSHARI v. MONSIR ANSHARI) Outcome: The bail petition filed by MD KASIM ANSHARI was rejected/denied. The petitioner, a child in conflict with law, was accused in connection with the death of his grandson (Md. Jisan Ansari, age 6) who went missing on 11.04.2021 and was found dead with burn injuries. Despite claims of innocence and false implication due to village politics, the court found credible evidence including confessional statements, adverse social background reports showing lack of discipline and quarrelsome nature, and hostile community perception. The court determined that releasing the petitioner on bail posed moral, physical, and psychological danger to him and would defeat justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case