RITESH KUMAR vs FARUKH RAEN AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMESH CHANDRA — 622/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRST010099902024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9990/2024
Filing Date
09-12-2024
Registration No
622/2024
Registration Date
09-12-2024
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
124
Police Station
CHORAUT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RITESH KUMAR
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
FARUKH RAEN AND OTHERS Advocate - RAMESH CHANDRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 16-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Court, Sitamarhi acquitted all three accused (Aadam Rain, Irshad Rain, and Faruk Rain) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 307/34, 504/34, and 506/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution witnesses contradicted themselves in cross-examination, the doctor and investigating officer were not examined, and no corroborative evidence supported the allegations of assault and robbery. The sureties were discharged from bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Court, Sitamarhi acquitted all three accused (Aadam Rain, Irshad Rain, and Faruk Rain) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 307/34, 504/34, and 506/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution witnesses contradicted themselves in cross-examination, the doctor and investigating officer were not examined, and no corroborative evidence supported the allegations of assault and robbery. The sureties were discharged from bail bond liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts