MAHENDRA RAM vs AMIT KUMAR SINGH — 1294/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,379,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

criminal. case - criminal.case

CNR: BRST010093652018

Filing Number

7741/2018

Filing Date

13-Oct-2018

Registration No

1294/2018

Registration Date

13-Oct-2018

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

SC/ST

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,379,504
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1) (s)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRA RAM

    Adv. N/A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KUMAR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Special SC/ST (POA) Act Court in Sitamarhi acquitted all seven accused persons (Amit Kumar Singh, Devanath Singh, Saroj Ray, Dharmendra Mahto, Lakshman Sah, Chandan Singh, and Shivoji Mahto) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 323/149, 504/34, 379/149, and SC/ST (POA) Act Section 3(1)(s), finding the prosecution's case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution relied solely on the testimony of the informant/victim (Mahendra Ram) without any corroborating documentary evidence or independent witnesses, rendering the allegations unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  14. 22-May-2025

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  15. 21-Mar-2025

    Appearence

    IC District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  16. 20-Jan-2025

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  17. 13-Nov-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  18. 13-Aug-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  19. 24-May-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  20. 28-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  21. 15-Dec-2023

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  22. 28-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  23. 01-Jul-2023

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  24. 26-Apr-2023

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  25. 16-Feb-2023

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  26. 15-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  27. 17-Oct-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  28. 24-May-2022

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  29. 21-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  30. 06-Jul-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  31. 02-Mar-2021

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  32. 13-Oct-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  33. 22-Jun-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  34. 12-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  35. 18-Nov-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  36. 18-Jul-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  37. 20-Apr-2019

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  38. 28-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 13-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1294/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special SC/ST (POA) Act Court in Sitamarhi acquitted all seven accused persons (Amit Kumar Singh, Devanath Singh, Saroj Ray, Dharmendra Mahto, Lakshman Sah, Chandan Singh, and Shivoji Mahto) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 323/149, 504/34, 379/149, and SC/ST (POA) Act Section 3(1)(s), finding the prosecution's case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution relied solely on the testimony of the informant/victim (Mahendra Ram) without any corroborating documentary evidence or independent witnesses, rendering the allegations unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case