BHIKHARI MAHTO vs NITESH KUMAR URF RUPESH KUMAR AND OTHERS — 385/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRST010052772025

Filing Number

13000/2025

Filing Date

06-Aug-2025

Registration No

385/2025

Registration Date

06-Aug-2025

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

SUPPI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHIKHARI MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NITESH KUMAR URF RUPESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court's decision finds that Nitesh Kumar Urf Rupesh Kumar Urf Bipesh Kumar and Sushil Kumar are guilty under IPC Sections 103(1) and 3(5) for causing the death of Pappu Kumar through chest injuries with a sharp instrument. The court concludes the prosecution has proven its case beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the accused's defense claims and accepting the medical evidence and testimony establishing their involvement in the fatal attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  13. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  16. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  17. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  19. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  20. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  21. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  22. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  23. 25-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  24. 15-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  25. 02-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  26. 28-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  27. 21-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  28. 12-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 06-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 385/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court's decision finds that Nitesh Kumar Urf Rupesh Kumar Urf Bipesh Kumar and Sushil Kumar are guilty under IPC Sections 103(1) and 3(5) for causing the death of Pappu Kumar through chest injuries with a sharp instrument. The court concludes the prosecution has proven its case beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the accused's defense claims and accepting the medical evidence and testimony establishing their involvement in the fatal attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case