CHANDAN KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 321/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRST010012252026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1100/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

321/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

118

Police Station

RUNISAIDPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 394

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDAN KUMAR

    Adv. SUBODH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Copy of order

    Case 321/2026 Summary: The court rejected Chandan Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in connection with Runnisaidpur PS Case No. 118/24 (IPC 394). Although the petitioner was not named in the FIR, his name surfaced in a co-accused's confessional statement. The court found his one prior criminal antecedent and pending investigation concerning, but directed that if arrested, his bail petition be decided within four weeks without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 321/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 321/2026 Summary: The court rejected Chandan Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in connection with Runnisaidpur PS Case No. 118/24 (IPC 394). Although the petitioner was not named in the FIR, his name surfaced in a co-accused's confessional statement. The court found his one prior criminal antecedent and pending investigation concerning, but directed that if arrested, his bail petition be decided within four weeks without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case