SUMAN KUMARI URF SUMAN KUMARI RANI vs State of Bihar — 309/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,82(1),115(2),126(2),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Disposed of on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRST010011742026

Filing Number

1053/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

309/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed of

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

Mahila P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,82(1),115(2),126(2),351(2),352,3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMAN KUMARI URF SUMAN KUMARI RANI

    Adv. RANI KUMARI

  2. 2.VINOD KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Suman Kumari and Vinod Kumar in a case involving allegations of cruelty, bigamy, and unnatural sexual acts. The court found that since the petitioners were not arrested during investigation and the chargesheet was filed without arrest, they should be released on regular bail upon receipt of summons rather than approach higher courts. The bail was granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 309/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Suman Kumari and Vinod Kumar in a case involving allegations of cruelty, bigamy, and unnatural sexual acts. The court found that since the petitioners were not arrested during investigation and the chargesheet was filed without arrest, they should be released on regular bail upon receipt of summons rather than approach higher courts. The bail was granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case