GAUTAM KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 249/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),309(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRST010011642026

Filing Number

1043/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

249/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

151

Police Station

BATHNAHA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),309(4),3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAUTAM KUMAR

    Adv. UMESH NANDAN VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of order

    Summary The District Court of Sitamarhi granted bail to Gautam Kumar in a criminal case involving armed robbery and firing. The court found that Kumar was not named in the FIR, had no recovery of incriminating articles, possessed no criminal record, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail on parity grounds, justifying his release on ₹15,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 249/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court of Sitamarhi granted bail to Gautam Kumar in a criminal case involving armed robbery and firing. The court found that Kumar was not named in the FIR, had no recovery of incriminating articles, possessed no criminal record, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail on parity grounds, justifying his release on ₹15,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case