VIBHA KUMARI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 7/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),352,74,115(2),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Disposed of on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail SC-ST Act

CNR: BRST010009952026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

897/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

7/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed of

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

SC/ST

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),352,74,115(2),351(2),3(5)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(r)(s)(w1),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIBHA KUMARI

    Adv. RANDHIR KUMAR VERMA

  2. 2.MANISH KUMAR URF MANJIT KUMAR

    Adv. RANDHIR KUMAR VERMA

  3. 3.SANJAY RAY

    Adv. RANDHIR KUMAR VERMA

  4. 4.RAJVANSHI DEVI

    Adv. RANDHIR KUMAR VERMA

  5. 5.SHOBHA DEVI

    Adv. RANDHIR KUMAR VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of the five petitioners charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, finding the nature of allegations involving caste-based violence sufficiently serious. However, the court directed that if the petitioners surrender before the trial court within four weeks (by 28.04.2026), their regular bail application will be considered on the same day without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of the five petitioners charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, finding the nature of allegations involving caste-based violence sufficiently serious. However, the court directed that if the petitioners surrender before the trial court within four weeks (by 28.04.2026), their regular bail application will be considered on the same day without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case