VINOD MAHTO vs STATE OF BIHAR — 213/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),303(2),351(1),352,76,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRST010009562026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

863/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

213/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

325

Police Station

SUPPI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),303(2),351(1),352,76,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

VINOD MAHTO

Adv. ALOK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

27-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

HEARING

10-04-2026

HEARING

25-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
Copy of order

Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi, granted bail to petitioner Binod Mahto in FIR No. 325/25 (Suppi Police Station) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 127(2), 303(2), 351(1), 352, 76, and 3(5). The court found that while a dispute existed between neighbors, no witness corroborated the use of weapons, the incident was delayed in reporting without justification, and the petitioner had spent significant time in custody since January 30, 2026. The court ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under BNSS Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi, granted bail to petitioner Binod Mahto in FIR No. 325/25 (Suppi Police Station) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 127(2), 303(2), 351(1), 352, 76, and 3(5). The court found that while a dispute existed between neighbors, no witness corroborated the use of weapons, the incident was delayed in reporting without justification, and the petitioner had spent significant time in custody since January 30, 2026. The court ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under BNSS Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case