VINOD MAHTO vs STATE OF BIHAR — 213/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),303(2),351(1),352,76,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRST010009562026
e-Filing Number
19-02-2026
Filing Number
863/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
213/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
325
Police Station
SUPPI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINOD MAHTO
Adv. ALOK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi, granted bail to petitioner Binod Mahto in FIR No. 325/25 (Suppi Police Station) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 127(2), 303(2), 351(1), 352, 76, and 3(5). The court found that while a dispute existed between neighbors, no witness corroborated the use of weapons, the incident was delayed in reporting without justification, and the petitioner had spent significant time in custody since January 30, 2026. The court ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under BNSS Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 213/2026
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi, granted bail to petitioner Binod Mahto in FIR No. 325/25 (Suppi Police Station) involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 127(2), 303(2), 351(1), 352, 76, and 3(5). The court found that while a dispute existed between neighbors, no witness corroborated the use of weapons, the incident was delayed in reporting without justification, and the petitioner had spent significant time in custody since January 30, 2026. The court ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under BNSS Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts