CHHOTU KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 164/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRST010007702026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2026
Filing Number
694/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
164/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
209
Police Station
BAJPATTI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHOTU KUMAR
Adv. RAMESH CHANDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of order
Case Summary: 164/2026 - Chhotu Kumar v. State of Bihar The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi granted bail to petitioner Chhotu Kumar, who had been in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with a motorcycle theft case (Bajpatti PS Case No. 209/25). The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement lacking evidentiary value, no incriminating material was recovered from his possession, and he had no criminal antecedent. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 164/2026
Case Summary: 164/2026 - Chhotu Kumar v. State of Bihar The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi granted bail to petitioner Chhotu Kumar, who had been in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with a motorcycle theft case (Bajpatti PS Case No. 209/25). The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement lacking evidentiary value, no incriminating material was recovered from his possession, and he had no criminal antecedent. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts