CHHOTU KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 164/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRST010007702026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

694/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

164/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

209

Police Station

BAJPATTI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

CHHOTU KUMAR

Adv. RAMESH CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

10-04-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

12-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of order

Case Summary: 164/2026 - Chhotu Kumar v. State of Bihar The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi granted bail to petitioner Chhotu Kumar, who had been in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with a motorcycle theft case (Bajpatti PS Case No. 209/25). The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement lacking evidentiary value, no incriminating material was recovered from his possession, and he had no criminal antecedent. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 164/2026 - Chhotu Kumar v. State of Bihar The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi granted bail to petitioner Chhotu Kumar, who had been in custody since 11.01.2026 in connection with a motorcycle theft case (Bajpatti PS Case No. 209/25). The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement lacking evidentiary value, no incriminating material was recovered from his possession, and he had no criminal antecedent. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case