ASHIK SHEKH vs STATE OF BIHAR — 196/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRST010007572026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

685/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

196/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

KANHAULI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHIK SHEKH

    Adv. NEETU KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Copy of order

    The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Ashique Sheikh (Ashik Shekh) on 15 April 2026. The dismissal was granted as withdrawn in connection with Kanhauli PS Case No. 5/26, where the petitioner had been arrested. The court accepted the withdrawal petition after both counsel for the petitioner and the state's representative were heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Ashique Sheikh (Ashik Shekh) on 15 April 2026. The dismissal was granted as withdrawn in connection with Kanhauli PS Case No. 5/26, where the petitioner had been arrested. The court accepted the withdrawal petition after both counsel for the petitioner and the state's representative were heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case