FEKAN MAHTO vs STATE OF BIHAR — 161/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 28th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRST010007342026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
663/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
161/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
312
Police Station
DUMRA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FEKAN MAHTO
Adv. SURENDRA PRASAD YADAV
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected Fekan Mahto's bail petition in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 312/2025, finding the charges sufficiently serious despite evidence suggesting the victim died two days after the alleged assault and injuries may not have been grave enough to cause death. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to renew his bail application two months after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected Fekan Mahto's bail petition in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 312/2025, finding the charges sufficiently serious despite evidence suggesting the victim died two days after the alleged assault and injuries may not have been grave enough to cause death. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to renew his bail application two months after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts