RAJEEV KUMAR URF BHOLU vs STATE OF BIHAR — 158/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRST010007312026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
660/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
158/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
118
Police Station
RUNISAIDPUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJEEV KUMAR URF BHOLU
Adv. SHUBHAM KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to petitioner Rajiv Kumar @ Bholu in a criminal case under IPC Section 394 (dacoity). The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was recovered from his possession, no TIP was conducted, and he was implicated only through a co-accused's confessional statement. Bail was allowed on furnishing Rs. 10,000/- bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to petitioner Rajiv Kumar @ Bholu in a criminal case under IPC Section 394 (dacoity). The court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was recovered from his possession, no TIP was conducted, and he was implicated only through a co-accused's confessional statement. Bail was allowed on furnishing Rs. 10,000/- bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts