BHIKHARI SAH URF BHIKARI SAH vs State of Bihar — 180/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20(b)(ii)(c),22(c),23(c). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRST010007112026

Filing Number

643/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

SONBERSA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20(b)(ii)(c),22(c),23(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHIKHARI SAH URF BHIKARI SAH

    Adv. VIVEK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of order

    The court dismissed Bhikhari Sah's anticipatory bail application under NDPS Act charges. While acknowledging the petitioner's claim of innocence and lack of criminal antecedents, the court found that 1.45 kg of opium was recovered and custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the case thoroughly given the commercial quantity involved and the district's proximity to Nepal, a known drug trafficking route. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Bhikhari Sah's anticipatory bail application under NDPS Act charges. While acknowledging the petitioner's claim of innocence and lack of criminal antecedents, the court found that 1.45 kg of opium was recovered and custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the case thoroughly given the commercial quantity involved and the district's proximity to Nepal, a known drug trafficking route. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case