LAKSHMI DEVI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 147/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRST010005972026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-01-2026

Filing Number

540/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

08

Police Station

BELA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

LAKSHMI DEVI

Adv. Sanjay Kumar

DAUWANA DEVI URF DAUNA DEVI

Adv. Sanjay Kumar

VIJAY MAHTO

Adv. Sanjay Kumar

RAGHUVEER URF RAGHUVEER KUMAR

Adv. Sanjay Kumar

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

HEARING

16-02-2026

HEARING

02-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of order

The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners Vijay Mahto and Raghuvir Kumar in a case involving the death of Awinash Kumar, finding sufficient evidence for custodial interrogation based on the circumstances of the incident. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Lakshmi Devi and Dauna Devi, finding no material evidence linking them to the offense, on condition of furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners Vijay Mahto and Raghuvir Kumar in a case involving the death of Awinash Kumar, finding sufficient evidence for custodial interrogation based on the circumstances of the incident. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Lakshmi Devi and Dauna Devi, finding no material evidence linking them to the offense, on condition of furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case