DHARMAVEER URF DHARAMAVEER KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 130/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRST010005892026

e-Filing Number

30-01-2026

Filing Number

532/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

130/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sitamarhi

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

08

Police Station

BELA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMAVEER URF DHARAMAVEER KUMAR

    Adv. Sanjay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of order

    Case 130/2026 Summary: The court rejected the bail petition of Dharmaveer Kumar, who has been in custody since January 12, 2026, in connection with a case under IPC Sections 103(1) and 103(5) (BNS). The court found that independent witnesses and case-diary entries supported the prosecution's case, and that the petitioner was allegedly following the deceased and may influence witnesses or tamper with evidence if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 130/2026 Summary: The court rejected the bail petition of Dharmaveer Kumar, who has been in custody since January 12, 2026, in connection with a case under IPC Sections 103(1) and 103(5) (BNS). The court found that independent witnesses and case-diary entries supported the prosecution's case, and that the petitioner was allegedly following the deceased and may influence witnesses or tamper with evidence if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case