MD SOHAIL vs STATE OF BIHAR — 90/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 326(2),115(2),118(1),109,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRST010003752026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2026
Filing Number
331/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
90/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
BHITHA PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD SOHAIL
Adv. RATNESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of order
The court rejected the bail petition filed by Md. Sohail, who has been in custody since December 18, 2025, in connection with a case involving alleged assault of the informant's father with a bamboo stick, causing grievous injury with over 50 stitches. The court found specific and credible allegations against the petitioner and determined that the nature of injury was serious, thereby refusing to grant bail on the grounds that the facts and circumstances of the case did not warrant it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2026
The court rejected the bail petition filed by Md. Sohail, who has been in custody since December 18, 2025, in connection with a case involving alleged assault of the informant's father with a bamboo stick, causing grievous injury with over 50 stitches. The court found specific and credible allegations against the petitioner and determined that the nature of injury was serious, thereby refusing to grant bail on the grounds that the facts and circumstances of the case did not warrant it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts