SANT RAM vs STATE OF BIHAR — 73/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,498(A). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRST010002862026
e-Filing Number
15-01-2026
Filing Number
254/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
73/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
CR.COMPLAINT-C1(Pupri)
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANT RAM
Adv. RANDHIR KUMAR VERMA
RAM KUMARI DEVI
Adv. RANDHIR KUMAR VERMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court confirmed the interim anticipatory bail granted to petitioners Sant Ram and Ram Kumari Devi (father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant) in a dowry harassment case under IPC 323,498A. The court found allegations against them vague, noted no injury report supported assault claims, and that the couple had reconciled after earlier separation, with no evidence of bail misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court confirmed the interim anticipatory bail granted to petitioners Sant Ram and Ram Kumari Devi (father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant) in a dowry harassment case under IPC 323,498A. The court found allegations against them vague, noted no injury report supported assault claims, and that the couple had reconciled after earlier separation, with no evidence of bail misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts