LALAN SAHNI URF LALAN KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 72/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRST010002812026
e-Filing Number
15-01-2026
Filing Number
249/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
72/2026
Registration Date
15-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1072
Police Station
CR.COMPLAINT-C1
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALAN SAHNI URF LALAN KUMAR
Adv. PRAVIN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The court confirmed interim bail granted to petitioner Lalan Sahni in a case registered under IPC sections 498(A) and 4 of the D.P. Act, stemming from a matrimonial dispute. The petitioner's bail was confirmed on the same terms after considering that both parties have settled their dispute through mediation, are now residing together, and the petitioner lacks criminal antecedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2026
The court confirmed interim bail granted to petitioner Lalan Sahni in a case registered under IPC sections 498(A) and 4 of the D.P. Act, stemming from a matrimonial dispute. The petitioner's bail was confirmed on the same terms after considering that both parties have settled their dispute through mediation, are now residing together, and the petitioner lacks criminal antecedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts