JAY MANGAL HAJARA vs RAM DAYAL HAJARA AND OTHERS Advocate - DILIP KUMAR SINGH — 20060/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRSR120002482017

Filing Number

20060/2017

Filing Date

23-Dec-2017

Registration No

20060/2017

Registration Date

23-Dec-2017

Court

Sonepur Civil Division

Judge

2-Munsif

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAY MANGAL HAJARA

    Adv. NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH TIKKA WALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM DAYAL HAJARA AND OTHERS Advocate - DILIP KUMAR SINGH

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Munsif

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Munsif

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Munsif

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  7. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  9. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  12. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  13. 22-May-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  14. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  15. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  16. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Munsif

  18. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  19. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  20. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  21. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  22. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

  23. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

  24. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

  25. 23-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  26. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  27. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  28. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  29. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Munsif

  30. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  31. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  32. 11-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  33. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  34. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  35. 22-Aug-2023

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the defendant's application dated 06-12-2022 seeking to recall the plaintiff's witness Ramanand for cross-examination. The court found that the witness, approximately 80 years old and unwell, had already appeared for cross-examination on two occasions but the defendant deliberately failed to cross-examine him, and subsequently the witness was discharged on 30-11-2021. The court held that repeatedly summoning the elderly and infirm witness would not be just and that the defendant's application appeared to be motivated by harassment and delay tactics. The case was adjourned for the plaintiff to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  36. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  37. 18-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  38. 20-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  39. 30-May-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  40. 09-May-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  41. 18-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  42. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  43. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  44. 24-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  45. 03-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Munsif

  46. 06-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  47. 01-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  48. 11-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  49. 20-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  50. 23-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  51. 26-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  52. 28-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  53. 24-May-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  54. 07-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  55. 26-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  56. 18-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Munsif

  57. 14-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Munsif

  58. 30-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Munsif

  59. 16-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Munsif

  60. 05-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Munsif

  61. 18-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Munsif

  62. 20-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Munsif

  63. 16-Jun-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  64. 12-May-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  65. 20-Apr-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  66. 31-Mar-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  67. 16-Mar-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  68. 23-Feb-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  69. 03-Feb-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  70. 19-Jan-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  71. 12-Jan-2021

    Order

    Munsif

  72. 24-Dec-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  73. 10-Nov-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  74. 17-Sep-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  75. 03-Aug-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  76. 02-Jun-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  77. 24-Mar-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  78. 03-Mar-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  79. 04-Feb-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  80. 07-Jan-2020

    Order

    Munsif

  81. 10-Dec-2019

    Order

    Munsif

  82. 07-Sep-2019

    Order

    Munsif

  83. 23-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 23-Dec-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20060/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the defendant's application dated 06-12-2022 seeking to recall the plaintiff's witness Ramanand for cross-examination. The court found that the witness, approximately 80 years old and unwell, had already appeared for cross-examination on two occasions but the defendant deliberately failed to cross-examine him, and subsequently the witness was discharged on 30-11-2021. The court held that repeatedly summoning the elderly and infirm witness would not be just and that the defendant's application appeared to be motivated by harassment and delay tactics. The case was adjourned for the plaintiff to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case