BIBI KANIJ FATMA vs ANITA DEVI — 92/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRSR120001582021
Filing Number
158/2021
Filing Date
06-Jul-2021
Registration No
92/2021
Registration Date
15-Jul-2021
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
2-Munsif
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIBI KANIJ FATMA
Adv. SUBODH KUMAR SINGH
-
2.ABDUL KUDDUS
Adv. SUBODH KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANITA DEVI
-
2.EHSALUL HAQUE
-
3.REYAJUL HAQUE
-
4.MAJHARUL HAQUE
-
5.IJHARUL HAQUE ANSARI
Case History
-
21-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Munsif
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence
Munsif
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence
Munsif
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
08-May-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence
Munsif
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
05-Sep-2024
OrderView PDF
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The court granted the plaintiff's petition to appoint a court commissioner (Advocate Commissioner) to conduct a local inspection of the disputed property (Case No. 92/2021). The court found it necessary to inspect the property's current physical condition on court records to ensure proper adjudication, as defendants had allegedly been altering the land's character through excavation and construction activities. The appointed commissioner, Shri Raju Rajak, must collect a fee of ₹3,000 and the case is adjourned for plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Sep-2024
Hearing
Munsif
-
22-Aug-2024
Hearing
Munsif
-
01-Aug-2024
Hearing
-
27-Jun-2024
Hearing
-
30-May-2024
Hearing
-
18-May-2024
Hearing
Munsif
-
09-May-2024
Hearing
Munsif
-
28-Mar-2024
Hearing
Munsif
-
22-Feb-2024
Hearing
Munsif
-
25-Jan-2024
Hearing
Munsif
-
21-Dec-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
23-Nov-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
13-Oct-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
22-Sep-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
25-Aug-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
28-Jul-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
30-Jun-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
19-May-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
19-Apr-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
21-Mar-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
02-Mar-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
15-Feb-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
25-Jan-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
04-Jan-2023
OrderView PDF
-
04-Jan-2023
Hearing
Munsif
-
14-Dec-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
09-Nov-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
20-Oct-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
22-Sep-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
24-Aug-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
22-Jul-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
24-Jun-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
17-May-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
01-Apr-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
18-Feb-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
11-Jan-2022
Hearing
Munsif
-
07-Dec-2021
Notice (Ready
Munsif
-
24-Nov-2021
Notice (Ready
Munsif
-
06-Oct-2021
Notice (Ready
Munsif
-
06-Sep-2021
Notice (Ready
Munsif
-
22-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2021
OUTCOME SUMMARY: The court granted the plaintiff's petition to appoint a court commissioner (Advocate Commissioner) to conduct a local inspection of the disputed property (Case No. 92/2021). The court found it necessary to inspect the property's current physical condition on court records to ensure proper adjudication, as defendants had allegedly been altering the land's character through excavation and construction activities. The appointed commissioner, Shri Raju Rajak, must collect a fee of ₹3,000 and the case is adjourned for plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts