SUNDARPATI DEVI AND OTHERS vs SACHCHITANAND THAKUR — 58/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRSR120001432020
Filing Number
143/2020
Filing Date
08-Sep-2020
Registration No
58/2020
Registration Date
21-Sep-2020
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNDARPATI DEVI AND OTHERS
Adv. NAWAL KUMAR SINGH
-
2.SUNAINA KUMARI
Adv. NAWAL KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SACHCHITANAND THAKUR
-
2.SAARDANAND THAKUR
-
3.LAXMAN RAY
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
23-Aug-2025
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
01-May-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Order
Sub-Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
Order
Sub-Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Order
Sub-Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
03-Apr-2024
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
28-Feb-2024
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Issues
Sub-Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
11-Sep-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
05-Aug-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
07-Jun-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
17-Apr-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
23-Feb-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
05-Jan-2023
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
03-Dec-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
11-Oct-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
26-Aug-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
16-Jul-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
21-Jun-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
10-May-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
22-Mar-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
08-Feb-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
25-Jan-2022
OrderView PDF
Summary The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that the disputed land belongs to them, finding instead that the land is owned by the defendant based on documentary evidence. The court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 500 with the registry and submit an amendment to their plea acknowledging the defendant's ownership. The next hearing is scheduled for 08.02.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jan-2022
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
14-Dec-2021
Order
Sub-Judge
-
26-Oct-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
10-Sep-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
13-Aug-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
28-May-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge
-
12-Mar-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge
-
19-Feb-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge
-
15-Dec-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2020
Summary The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that the disputed land belongs to them, finding instead that the land is owned by the defendant based on documentary evidence. The court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 500 with the registry and submit an amendment to their plea acknowledging the defendant's ownership. The next hearing is scheduled for 08.02.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts