JANKI DEVI AND OTHERS vs NASIM KHAN AND OTHERS Advocate - SUSIL KUAR SINGH — 12/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--RESTORATION on 09th March 2026.
Mislaneous
CNR: BRSR120001242015
Filing Number
12/2015
Filing Date
25-Jun-2015
Registration No
12/2015
Registration Date
25-Jun-2015
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--RESTORATION
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JANKI DEVI AND OTHERS
Adv. TAPESHWAR PRASAD SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.NASIM KHAN AND OTHERS Advocate - SUSIL KUAR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Sub-Judge-I Court at Sonpur set aside an ex-parte judgment and decree dated 03.02.2014 and 27.02.2014 in Partition Suit No. 627 of 2011, finding that the applicants (Ram Babu Singh and others) were never served proper summons and had no knowledge of the suit proceedings. The court determined that the opposite party obtained the ex-parte decree through fraud and misrepresentation by suppressing facts and concealing the suit's pendency. The original partition suit is restored, allowing all defendants to file written statements and contest the suit on merits with a cost of Rs. 3,500 imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub-Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
27-May-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
15-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
05-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-May-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
30-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
30-Nov-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
14-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
04-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
22-May-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
27-Mar-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
19-Jan-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
03-Nov-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Sep-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
27-Jun-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
04-Apr-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
17-Jan-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
01-Nov-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Aug-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
31-May-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
05-Apr-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jan-2021
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
23-Nov-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
13-Oct-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
25-Aug-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
16-Jun-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
12-May-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
25-Mar-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
28-Feb-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
31-Jan-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
13-Dec-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
25-Oct-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
13-Sep-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-Aug-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
05-Jul-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
11-Jun-2019
Evidence
Munsif
-
30-Apr-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
22-Apr-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Apr-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
16-Mar-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Mar-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jun-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2015
Summary The Sub-Judge-I Court at Sonpur set aside an ex-parte judgment and decree dated 03.02.2014 and 27.02.2014 in Partition Suit No. 627 of 2011, finding that the applicants (Ram Babu Singh and others) were never served proper summons and had no knowledge of the suit proceedings. The court determined that the opposite party obtained the ex-parte decree through fraud and misrepresentation by suppressing facts and concealing the suit's pendency. The original partition suit is restored, allowing all defendants to file written statements and contest the suit on merits with a cost of Rs. 3,500 imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts