SANJIV SRIVASTAVA vs RUPAN RAI AND OTHERS Advocate - NAVAL KUMAR SINGH — 455/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRSR120001202016
Filing Number
455/2016
Filing Date
21-Sep-2016
Registration No
455/2016
Registration Date
21-Sep-2016
Court
Sonepur Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJIV SRIVASTAVA
Adv. DHANANJAY SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RUPAN RAI AND OTHERS Advocate - NAVAL KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
15-Jul-2025
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Further Proceeding
Sub-Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Order
Sub-Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Order
Sub-Judge
-
18-Feb-2025
Order
Sub-Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Order
Sub-Judge
-
24-Dec-2024
Order
Sub-Judge
-
26-Nov-2024
Order
Sub-Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
03-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
30-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
08-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
13-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
01-Nov-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
21-Sep-2022
OrderView PDF
Summary: In Haq Iyat (Property) Case No. 455 of 2016 between Sanjit Srivastav (plaintiff) and Roopan Rai (defendant) decided on 21.09.2022, the Sonpur Court allowed the plaintiff's application dated 24.02.2021 to file public documents as evidence. The court noted that the plaintiff submitted six public documents (including certified copies of property account entries and land records) and requested their admission in the court record. Since the defendant failed to file a counter-reply despite multiple opportunities, the court accepted the plaintiff's application to mark all submitted public documents as exhibits in the case. The matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Sep-2022
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
06-Jul-2022
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
18-May-2022
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
13-Apr-2022
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
09-Mar-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge
-
22-Dec-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
29-Sep-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
04-Aug-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
12-May-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
24-Feb-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge
-
09-Dec-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
14-Oct-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
28-Sep-2020
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
07-Jul-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
05-May-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
17-Mar-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
19-Feb-2020
Evidence
Sub Judge II
-
23-Jan-2020
Evidence
-
12-Dec-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
17-Oct-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
29-Aug-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Jul-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
23-May-2019
Evidence
Munsif
-
02-May-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
18-Apr-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
28-Feb-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
14-Feb-2019
Evidence
Sub-Judge
-
24-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Sep-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 455/2016
Summary: In Haq Iyat (Property) Case No. 455 of 2016 between Sanjit Srivastav (plaintiff) and Roopan Rai (defendant) decided on 21.09.2022, the Sonpur Court allowed the plaintiff's application dated 24.02.2021 to file public documents as evidence. The court noted that the plaintiff submitted six public documents (including certified copies of property account entries and land records) and requested their admission in the court record. Since the defendant failed to file a counter-reply despite multiple opportunities, the court accepted the plaintiff's application to mark all submitted public documents as exhibits in the case. The matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts